• Scott Esposito reviews Duchess of Nothing by Heather McGowan for the San Francisco Chronicle.
In its unadorned reality filtered through an unstable mind, "Duchess of Nothing" brings to mind classics such as Knut Hamsun’s Hunger and Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway. As in those books, the narrator may be dishonest with herself, but she is far from stupid, and much of what she says is beautifully expressed and evocative of thoughts and ideas that far surpass the prosaic reality she is trying to understand.
• Michael Standaert’s Skipping Towards Armageddon is scheduled for release today by Soft Skull Press.
The most effective message yet found by the hijackers of mainstream religion is Tim LaHaye’s Left Behind series of apocalyptic Christian novels. This wide-ranging study examines the books and the empire behind them. Author Michael Standaert contextualizes the Left Behind phenomenon by probing millennial thinking across cultures, from pre-Christian times to the present, and tracing the evolution of militant evangelism in the U.S., uncovering the links between fundamentalist religious figures and mainstream right-wing politicians through organizations like the Moral Majority. Skipping Towards Armageddon rips the lid off the Left Behind books’ ideological underpinnings, showing how LaHaye uses them to advance the foreign and domestic policy goals Religious Right, from fomenting Middle East violence to promoting homophobia and xenophobia. The book is a timely cautionary tale, revealing that these best-selling books are not simply harmless thrillers written from an evangelical Christian perspective but a tool in a fanatical group’s agenda.
Also check out Standaert’s excellent blog of the same name.
• Leon Wieseltier cops to being useless when it comes to the war:
The best that can be said of George W. Bush is that he is a small man doing a big thing. And of the war, that good may still come of it. I told you, I have nothing useful to say.
• I’m late to this party, but through a little friendly encouragement, I finally found my way to Mark Greif’s piece in n+1 “Radiohead, or the Philosophy of Pop.”
The answers are difficult not because thinking is hard on the subject of pop, but because of an acute sense of embarrassment. Popular music is the most living art form today. Condemned to a desert island, contemporary people would grab their records first; we have the concept of desert island discs because we could do without most other art forms before we would give up songs. Songs are what we consume in greatest quantity; they’re what we store most of in our heads. But even as we can insist on the seriousness of value of pop music, we don’t believe enough in its seriousness of meaning outside the realm of music, or most of us don’t, or we can’t talk about it, or sound idiotic when we do.
• B. R. Myers on the notorious Korean temperament (courtesy The Marmot’s Hole):
If I remember rightly, the last World Cup’s “upgrade” of Korea’s image was followed by the downsizing or closing of Korean Studies departments across Europe. And since then, I have met foreigners who instinctively assume that the Japanese claim to Dokdo Island is the more valid one, because the Japanese seem more rational about it.
I hope to see a Confucian sense of moderation during this World Cup. But when you’re Korean it’s much easier to be a nationalist than a patriot, easier to feel a constant xenophobic aggrievement than to cultivate an informed love of an ancient tradition.
The more Korea neglects its language and culture, which are worth a million World Cups, the more it will behave like one giant favela, feeling a thrill of pride only when foreign teams “submit,” as the tabloids say, to its own. I don’t think the real Taekukki warriors died for this.
PS—The article comes outfitted with a photograph of the witty & jaded Myers. Admit it, you were curious.
• Ian Buruma on Park Chan-wook, director of Oldboy, Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance, and J.S.A.
Sitting in his office not long ago, we talked about violence, or more specifically about Park’s terror of violence. “In my films, I focus on pain and fear,” he said. “The fear just before an act of violence and the pain after. This applies to the perpetrators as well as the victims.” To illustrate his point, Park described a scene from his last film, Lady Vengeance, in which the father of a kidnapped and murdered child finally has the kidnapper at his mercy, tied to a chair in an abandoned schoolhouse. The father is there with his family and relatives of the child murderer’s other young victims. They all patiently wait their turns to wreak a terrible revenge on the defenseless killer.
“The father,” Park continued, “has picked up his ax. His daughter tries to restrain him. The audience expects her to say something like, ‘No, don’t do it!’ Instead, she asks him to leave the victim alive, so the rest of the family can also have a go at him. The audience laughs. The next shot shows the father with his ax dripping blood, terrified of what he has just done. The audience can’t be cynical anymore and regrets having laughed at the preparation for such a brutal act.”
Park didn’t smile while he told me this. Violence, for him, is a serious business. He may have a disturbing way of manipulating the viewers’ emotions, but as he explained to me, the focus of his work is not “the beauty or humor of violence.”
• Fred Ramey, publisher of Unbridled Books, on reading a best-seller (courtesy the newly redesigned Reading Experience) . . .
Recently, while trying to read a novel that had graced the independent best-seller lists for several weeks, I came to the realization that a great many readers (enough to cause that book to hit those lists) are apparently perfectly willing to muscle their way through a kind of narrative clumsiness, through some simple repetitiveness and quiet familiarity, and really through an inattention to language and to the emotions that are tied to language.
[. . .]
Maybe every popular novel is only skimmed.
Suddenly, that seems feasible.
For what it’s worth, I bought The Da Vinci Code in the airport this past week and I’m about halfway through it. I’m enjoying it thoroughly and haven’t skimmed a bit.
IMAGE: Crucufixión (1515) by Grünewald (from the cool Spanish blog that I can’t read but can only look at: El puente azul)